A Motion tracking system is a great way to take your training to the next step, and there are several options, including the Soloshot vs Move N See cameras. The Soloshot is one of the first moving cameras to hit the market. But since then, many rivals have joined the market.
Here will take a close look at the Soloshot and the Move N See tracking cameras. Hopefully, this will help give you a good idea about the pros and cons of each before you decide what one you want.
The current model available is the SOLOSHOT3. This camera comes in two versions, one with an Optic25 camera and one with an Optic65 camera. So what’s the difference?
While both cameras have a hefty price tag, the Optic25 is cheaper, selling for around $900. The Optic65 sells for around $1,200. The number following the word Optic refers to the zoom capabilities of the camera. The 25 has a 25x zoom, and the 65 has a 65x zoom.
If you’re looking to record at a distance under 600-feet, the Optic25 is suitable. However, if you want to go beyond 600-feet, then the Optic65 is the better option. Both versions allow for live streaming and can take 12mp photos.
In addition to the zoom capabilities, the other difference between the two Soloshot cameras is the video format. The Optic25 records video in 1080p, while the Optic65 can record in 4K. Neither camera is suited for indoor tracking, so you can only use them outside for the best results. For the camera to track, the subject needs to wear a tag that is secured on their body.
Soloshot Pros And Cons
Equestrians looking to record their rides, either at home or at a show, will find the distance capabilities of the Optic25 lacking. But this camera is a good option for recording smaller areas, such as a round pen. However, for outdoor arenas, you should look more closely at the Optic65 to ensure you get a good picture.
The biggest drawback of the Soloshot is its outdoor-only capabilities. For equestrians, especially those who use indoor arenas for significant parts of the year, this can really put a damper on your training. The price is another off-putting aspect, particularly when you can’t even use the camera year-round.
Reviews of the Soloshot are mixed. Many customers complain about poor customer service, such as not replying to emails or answering the phone. Considering the cost of the camera, this is a bit off-putting if you run into an issue.
Other issues highlighted by customers include glitchy software, failing to track some percentage of the time, and poor battery life. Many customers feel the camera is still good but not quite there yet and still needs refining.
Move N See
The Move N See is also known as the Pixeo. It is the first tracking camera to hit the market that can record indoors and outdoors. Right of the bat, indoor recording puts this camera ahead in the Soloshot vs Move N See comparison for equestrians.
One of the biggest differences between the Move N See and Soloshot is that the Move N See is a robot that you attach a third-party camera to. Two versions are available, the Pixeo and Pixem. The main difference is that the Pixem is designed for tablets and smartphones, while the Pixeo is for attaching cameras.
Move N See Pros And Cons
The range of the Move N See tracking system is 330-feet. Both versions allow for live streaming and have automatic zoom capabilities. A 330-feet distance limit isn’t ideal for equestrians looking to record their rides, especially outdoors.
The cost, while cheaper than the Soloshot, is still expensive. On the plus side, the Pixeo can support a pretty hefty camera, up to five pounds. Users have more positive things to say about the Move N See than the Soloshot.
However, not everything about the Move N See is perfect. While users find the device easy to set up and use, some feel the construction quality is poor. Some found the tripods provided for the beacons flimsy.
Soloshot VS Move N See
Comparing these two tracking systems presents equestrians with a tough choice. The distance capabilities of both Soloshot versions far outstrip the Move N See. Having the ability to record further than 600-feet is certainly a plus for horse riders.
However, the Soloshot shots outdoors only, while the Move N See words indoors. Another difference is that the Soloshot is everything in one unit, while the Move N See requires a third-party camera. Build quality is another concern, especially around the always unpredictable world of horses.
Users that have used both tracking devices say that the Soloshot is more sturdy, while the Move N See seems like it could break easily. It is also worth noting that the Pixeo does not have an auto-tilt feature, while the Soloshot does. When used outside, the Move N See is more difficult to use when windy.
The beacons are light and easily blown over by the wind, potentially messing up your tracking. Both devices face battery life issues if you want to record a long riding session. Always make sure the unit is fully charged, or better yet, find a location where you can keep it plugged in.
As a horse rider myself, I’m leaning towards the Move N See. I like that ability to record inside, meaning I’ll get more use out of it. And for the price, it makes sense to get as much value as possible from the one I choose.
However, both tracking systems both have their limits. Having good customer service to fall back on is important, especially if the tracker has known software problems. The Soloshot and Move N See aren’t the only two tracking systems available.
Before choosing a system to record your horse riding, take a good look at all the options. Weight up the pro and cons against your specific environment, before investing in what is a significantly priced item.